Monday, June 6, 2011

`Piri' & `Miri'

I have always strongly believed that `piri’ (from the Persian word Pir meaning religious or spiritual guides) and `miri’ (again from a Persian word – Amir or lord, but meaning here state craft or power) should be kept apart.

In multi-religious, multi-lingual India, the most successful rulers have always been those who have managed to keep religion and statecraft apart. They may have been deeply religious persons in their own life but in matters of state they remained secular and thence lay the secret of their success.

In our history we have termed only two emperors as Great - Ashoka and Akbar. Not because, they pushed India’s frontiers the furthest, not because they won great battles but rather because their age was one of reason, tolerance, peace and prosperity wrought about by a strong secular polity, which advocated respect for all religions and was backed by equally strong statecraft.

Whenever anyone has tried to merge the two concepts – `piri’ and `miri’ – into one being in Indian politics, he has created a conflagration which has had devastating effect on national polity. Muhammad Ai Jinnah, Bhindranwale and Narendra Modi come to mind as leaders who failed to realize their potential and created a catastrophe for their followers by trying to bring religion into play in statecraft. (The only exception to this rule is perhaps that of Sikh Gurus who merged the two concepts in leading a religious state in Punjab. But then this state too did not differentiate between Sikhs, Hindus or Muslims in matters of state and thus in reality did differentiate between `piri’ and `miri’.)

When Baba Ramdev showed sings of trying to get onto the National political stage, I had similar forebodings. A successful yoga Guru, head of a multi-billion dollar empire of yoga schools and Ayurvedic medi-care, Ramdev has followers cutting across religion, but mostly among middle and lower middle class Hindus, who see in him some kind of a modern Vedic healer.

The hairy, cock-eyed Yogi, who has mesmerized TV audiences with his lectures on lifestyle, health and his yogic prescriptions for various ailments, consequently, has a huge following. His detractors of course, have many questions to ask about his jet-setting, island buying lifestyle. But then that is a different story.

When Ramdev announced that he would go on an indefinite fast against corruption, a battle already being fought quite ably by social activist Anna Hazare, advocates Shanti and Prashant Bhushan and former policewoman Kiran Bedi, many saw in his move an attempt to gain space by piggybacking on a popular cause.

While Hazare’s movement against corruption had to face first government apathy and then grudging negotiations where every attempt was made to sideline him, Ramdev was met with royal treatment. Even before his fast started, top government ministers rushed to meet his jet at the airport and try and convince him not to agitate. His protest which could have been just another `me too’ one, suddenly had national spotlights on it.

Social activists from Hazare camp looked upon him enviously and wondered if he was a government plant, set up to steal their hour of glory. Politicians from the rightwing BJP watched him nervously as a long term potential challenger of the rightwing space in politics and hinted darkly that he was a Congress stooge, set up to cut their votes in the next general elections.

In the meantime, an agreement on steps to tackle black money was reached with the government and Ramdev was supposed to have a token fast. But the yoga guru stepped up his demands and made all kinds of new demands including scrapping Rs 500 and Rs 1000 notes. By midnight, the mood at the venue of his fast – Delhi’s Ramlila Grounds turned from one of celebration at snatching an agreement from a powerful government to one of apprehension as the police cancelled his permission to hold an assembly on the large expanse of green in the heart of Old Delhi.

Ramdev was briefly held and then whisked away by helicopter and car to his Ashram at Hardwar. A midnight snatch along with allegations that he was roughed up, which raised the Guru’s popularity ratings and seemed to lay at rest the theory that he was a Congress creation.

The Guru’s gullible and simple followers were not that lucky. Many of them who had formed a human chain around the man, were badly beaten up by India’s medieval mentality police force. A lady had her spine broken and is reportedly lying paralysed. Another old man had both his legs broken by the cane charge. A Bengali woman who had very foolishly brought her child to the agitation venue, was still searching for the kid, hours after the crackdown which saw police firing tear gas shells to disperse Ramdev’s supporters.

What will happen next? Well Ramdev has already become a hero of sorts, thanks to the Congress government’s actions. Yet at the same time, this crackdown and possible CBI probes against the jet setting baba, will mean that any steps taken by the Government now to arrest corruption will not carry with it the stigma of being forced down its throat by any Hazare or Ramdev.

If Ramdev jumps into politics next, cashing on his new found status as a social crusader hurt by an uncaring government, he could well fight the BJP for its niche political space – rightwing obscurantist. Again that should arithmetically leave the Congress, the better off in consolidating its secular space.

However in real life, scripts and game theory often take a back seat and the unpredictable takes over. If it does in Ramdev’s case, we could well be witnessing the birth of yet another cult player who tries to merge `piri’ and `miri’ for his personal rise.

17 comments:

Jayati said...

Best blog ever! Interesting insight into the baba mayhem.

Rumjhum said...

Excellent blog! I like you idea of "Piri and Miri"

sushil said...

a balanced non-theatrical approach,touching the salient points in a rational and unbiased way...great Jayanta

PRADEEP said...

An awesome overview of the events that tend to ail the nation today.

PRADEEP said...

An awesome overview of what ails our country today. Fundamentalist forces are trying to piggy-back on Anna & Baba; while the former's actions are getting diluted, tha latter's actions are polarising the masses.

Sammy said...

Jayanta, Very well written ! thank you for such narration for people like us who are not in Delhi at this moment. I have 2 observations, if you permit -
1. Ramdev's musings about black money in swiss banks is perhaps older than hazare's - as pointed out by Raja on FB - and i can agree with him.

2. the reported agreement with Govt, that the black money in swiss bank (lets make it BMSB ! lol) will be declared national property or something of that sort - isnt it ridiculous ? we all know that such declarations are only for domestic consumption, it doesn't even merit a place in the trash cans of swiss banks - simply because of the baseless phenomenon - i think u n i know better how such things are "taken action on" and then "filed" by SB & NB. I wish, the Indian mainstream media would have called this bluff.

anyway...u did a gr8 job.

vinod said...

Very well written. The Indian democracy must address all the problems in the Parliament. No individual Neta and Guru should be permitted to force or blackmail the Government of the day.
Great SCAMS and CORRUPTION in our democracy are the result of willful negligence of our GREAT leaders who have governed the country on the basis of Vote Banks and the only LOVE for power for the dynasty rule.

After the Maharajas and Zamindars, it is the new breed of Netajis and Gurus who would somehow manage to remain in power. ‘ Piri and Meri’, have different meaning and should not be treated as one. Let us all work to elect our representatives to the Great Institute - the Parliament, with true earnest for the generations to come. The self styled Netajis and Gurus with Lust for power must be weeded out with strong determination to run democracy .

Mahendra said...

The 'piri' and 'miri' angle is perfect, with Ashok and Akbar citations.

The Sikh Gurus mixed the two to fight the Mughals. They went about converting (particularly Gobind Singh) and militarising the Punjab society. That culture dominates the two Punjab today -- forging the Fauji supremacy in Pakistan's Punjab.

The GOI miscalculated and then mismanaged. They thought, perhaps correctly, that Baba was easier to handle and tried to placate him. But they failed to realise his penchant for media attention. After being a successful Guru and businessman, having amassed wealth and vast following, this was to be his hour of personal glory.

When carrot failed and the stick began to work in the form of his arrest, the GOI handled it roughly, as it happens when you unleash police on a crowd. Baba too panicked, as evident from his trying to hide and escape in woman's attire.

As for the GOI, both the carrot and the stick failed. It may have touched the sentiments of a large Hindu middle class -- larger than Hazare did.

The only justification can be, GOI saw --having facilitated it earlier -- the visions of an Ayodhya happening in the heart of the national capital, and could not afford to allow its repetation. Baba understood this, which is why he is alluding to a 'conspiracy' to kill him and the GOI's plans to blame it on Muslims, "with so many mosques around..."

The BJP and RSS too thought Baba was easier to handle than Hazare and the other educated civil society people. They also feared, rightly, that GOI would use Baba to divide the Hazare-led movement. But once Baba was at Ramlila Ground, the BJP/RSS got impatient and rushed to be by his side (Sadhvi Ritambhara).

Baba's eviction haw given them yet another issue to beat the GOI/Congress with. But support to Baba can be counterproductive for BJP/RSS -- just the way creating and supporting Bhinderanwale boomeranged on the Congress.

Which is what makes the mixing of 'piri' and 'miri' dangerous.

Indians keep doing this in each decade, leading to 1984, 1992, 2002...

Will we ever learn?

Overall, brilliant analysis, Jayanta.

bharati said...

Brilliant piece Jayanta!

Transparency is an important factor on which character of a mass movement is judged. Baba Ramdev failed completely in showing transparency in his negotiations with the government.

Also, why is it that people like Baba Ramdev and Anna Hazare are getting that kind of popular support in their agitations against corruption? Its because our political parties, especially those in the opposition, have failed completely in providing leadership to popular sentiments on burning issues facing the nation.

As far as the government is concerned, its tough attitude to Baba, and now even the civil society representatives on the Lok Pal panel no doubt puts it in bad light.

At the same time, it gives Dr Manmohan Singh an unique opportunity to proove his government's credentials in acting against corruption even while taking on Ramdev. This is the choice Dr Manmohan Singh and Sonha Gandhi have to make.

suryamurthy said...

Interesting blog.....some observations.

There is nothing wrong in taking inspiration from religion. Father of the nation Mahatma Gandhi had been inspired by the principles of Hinduism while leading the anti-colonial struggle. Satyagraha is one such thing. (Sanskrit: सत्याग्रह satyāgraha), loosely translated as "Soul Force" or "truth force". Gandhi based this completely nonviolent struggle on his idea of ahimsa.

Like him there were others who took inspiration from Hinduism, Islam and Christianity.

Even his followers viewed him from religious perception, some as an avatar. Oral history has numerous such references.

As far as Baba Ramdev is concerned, he is seen only as a yoga guru and not as any spiritual leader of Hinduism. So when he started his Satyagraha, many eyebrows went up.

His fight against corruption appeared to be cashing on the Anna Hazare campaign.

While the middle class - so called watchdog of the society - are concerned about corruption at home and loot being stashed abroad, aam aadmi is disgusted with the system.

Congress government first tried to woo Baba Ramdev by bending backwards, showing their political immaturity, that his followers would be potential vote changers.

They simply thought that Baba Ramdev appeal could provide political milage like Dera sacha sauda or nirankari baba or the appeal of Imam of different masjids in the country or appeal by church influencing voters in Kerala or North East.

Later, when realisation struck, they simply used the police to tear gas the sit in.

Interesting would be a comparative analysis of Anna and Ramdev fast in the recent months.

Why the government did not use force to disperse Anna supporters; where they caught unaware or did not want a repeat of the "Indian jasmine revolution".

The two protests are an interesting topic for an in depth research on popular protests and relevance of Gandhigiri in 21st century India.

satinder said...

Very nicely, incisively and precisely written. The best observation "Sikh Gurus who merged the two concepts in leading a religious state in Punjab. But then this state too did not differentiate between Sikhs, Hindus or Muslims in matters of state and thus in reality did differentiate between `piri’ and `miri’."
Miri and piri are two swords and very few people can carry them together, a la wearing a number of hats.
Thanks.

Aranjit Bhattacharya said...

Very well written blog, Jayanta, but not without bias. I am a Politico-Neutral person ... and when I read yours and such other's pieces, it seems there exists a strong negative vibe towards the so-called right-wing party(s). Personally, I have strong aversion to all these babas ... I believe (a) religion/ spiritualism are extremely private and should be practiced privately (b) Hinduism is 'a way of life' and not a religion in the same sense of say Christianity or Islam or Buddhism etc. (c) I am still wondering what was the compulsion (on the part of GOI) to do the drama at midnight!!!

Aline Dobbie said...

What an excellent analysis of the whole affair and I have taken the observation about Piri & Miri in as well. What also heartens me is the response in the above Comments which reinforces for me a Scot but born in India which I love dearly that there are many wise observant people in India...please just stand up and be counted and counteract corruption bad governance and inertia.

sud said...

Dear Jayanta
While the analysis is logical, it is not true to say that religion has not been mixed with politics. Ashoka was a die-hard who spread Buddhism across the frontiers of India with this becoming the near state religion. Akbar tried to mix two religions in Din-e-Ilahi, a new religion to get Hindu and Muslim together besides marrying many Rajput princess. Mahatma Gandhi said that political and morality (which he found in religion) cannot be separated. He was not liked by western secularists but still continued his fight. When he launched Khilafat, Jinnah, whom you called communalist had opposed Gandhi. Not about Baba. Baba was hounded out not because he tried to mix religion with politics but because he riased the issue of black money stashed in foreign banks. There was a difference between Baba and Anna. While Anna's was a middle class elite movement, Baba has a great following in real India. There are few who can dare to fill Ramlila Maidan. He did it through assiduous moblisation. When secular politicians have failed the country it is time for people like Ramdev and Anna to come and try to fill the void. I do not see any problems in that. If people have guts to talk against corruption they must be hailed or nailed through facts.

My Diary said...

Excellent analysis.Religion is deeply embedded into our socio-political anatomy. It is therefore the very tool that can trigger upheaval amongst the masses.The further we distance ourslves from public exposition of religion,the better.In my outfit,religion is a very very personal affair and this system works wonerfully well.

Jayanta Roy Chowdhury said...

@Sud- Ashoka was a Buddhist convert and did much to popularise the religion throughout Asia. BUt he never ran his cominions on the basis of religion. He maintained a secular polity in his choice of ministers and officials and in his dispension of justice.
Similarly, Akbar, despite following a Sufi Islamic sect to start with and later experimenting with Din e Ilahi, he appointed Hindus and Muslims from opposing sects to top jobs, did not discriminate as a matter of state policy.
On Gandhi's Khilafat movement, MJ Akbar seems to suggest in his latest book on Pakistan that, that particular experiment in using religious forces was the starting point of our neighbouring state.
Hazare's following is from the middle class, while Ramdev's from the lower middle. None of them commands the real poor masses from villages and urban slums. If you want to see rallier where such people come then you will have to travel with me to mamata didi's rallies:)

escaping2nowhere said...

This whole Piri and Miri angle doesn't really apply to Ramdev. I hope you can differentiate between the Babas like Asaram Bapu and Ramdev. While Majority of them talk about intangibles like Aatma and Moksha, ramdev from day one talked about health Benefits about "yog" and people have benefited from it and from the very start he had been raising issues in his camps. whether it was harmful effect of Colas or corruption. So what his ideology(real or projected) was clear from the start. I really don't understand what do you want to convey "but mostly among middle and lower middle class Hindus, who see in him some kind of a modern Vedic healer." are you trying to say that the support of Ramdev is based on some kind of blind faith ? and what does vedic represent here ? I hope you are not equating vedic with obscurantism. Also, its funny how you go take pains to elaborate the how the "piri" and "miri" was seperate in the Sikh kingdom when the the foundations were clearly rooted in Sikhism. The point being that please extend the benefit doubt that you give to Sikh Kingdom to Ramdev also . I have never heard that non Hindus were not allowed in his Yog camps or even in his anti corruption agitation. I have not seen him use the word "Hindu" anywhere. Its always Bharat. so where is this whole religion coming from ? Just because he wears saffrom clothes ?That is what scares you? By that logic even Vivekananda was not secular. From what I have seen and heard so far ,Ramdev has not uttered anything anti secular.He has talked about corruption and he has been talking it for a while now.so I don't see any inconsistency there.
Now finally the question whether he has political ambitions? for me that question is no at all relevant. what's the problem if he has ? Why can't a Yoga teacher ( YOGA TEACHER is the word and there scores of them in India and outside.This one just happened to connect with larger no. of people) become a politician ?If the political system or even those outside it were alert to issue of corruption, why didn't anyone raise this issue. Its only when Anna Hazare talked about it that the issue got attention. Clealry the political class didn't act. So isn't it good news that people from different walks come forward to fight against corruption ? or are you suggesting that Anna has the right do it because he wears a Gandhi topi ( BTW Gandhi was a very religious man and quite publicly expressed it too . remember "Raghupati raghav raja ram " ? Gandhi too was right wing/ communal etc ? ) I don't care what Political affiliations or ambitions Ramdev has.I see his (and Anna's) agitation as a great opportunity educate and mobilise the people on this very serious issue because this has brought the issue on the centerstage like never before. So instead of cribbing about his ambitions you should think about the issue which is corruption because right now a debate and a mood has been created and no one has stopped others to take this movement in their hands. for instance a teacher could tell his students about the issue of corruption and mobilise them . would that be unethical ? a teacher talking politics to his students? I am not a follower of Ramdev but the this whole argueent that brands him right wing/anti secular really stems from a very narrow view where people can be branded as per your convinience ( So Sikh Kingdom is secular and Ramdev is right wing/ communal !!some logic !) please spend time on thinking how this renewed debate and public mood can be channelised to find a way to curb corruption rather than creating unnecessary diversion by focussing on non essentials.